Logo
    Show
    Hide
    Login
    Close

    SITE LOGIN

    • Forgot your password?

    Register

    New Ski Touring Maps and Guides
    • REVIEWS
      • Ski Gear
        • Skis
        • Boots
        • Bindings
        • Climbing Skins
        • Poles
        • Snowboards
      • Clothing
        • Hard Shells
        • Soft Shells
        • Insulation
        • Mid Layers
        • Base Layers
        • Gloves
        • Socks
      • Accessories
        • Safety Gear
        • Goggles and Helmets
        • Ski Touring Packs
        • Ski Boxes and Bags
        • Sleeping Bags - 4 Season
        • Technology
        • Sunglasses
        • Insoles & Braces
        • Books
      • Off-Season Gear
        • Hiking
          • Rain Shells
          • Day Packs
          • Apparel
          • Footwear
          • Safety
        • Camping
          • Backpacks
          • Sleeping Bags
          • Sleeping Pads
          • Tents
          • Coolers / Cooking
          • Furniture / Storage
          • Lighting / Power
        • Biking
        • Paddling
        • Climbing
        • Mountaineering
        • Running
      • Lifestyle
      • Lodges and Accommodation
      • Nutrition
      • Manufacturers
      • Destinations
      • Training
      • Gear of the Year
      • Best New Summer Gear
        • Best New Summer Gear 2022
        • Best New Summer Gear 2021
        • Best New Summer Gear 2020
      • Holiday Gift Guide
        • Holiday Gift Guide 2022
        • Holiday Gift Guide 2021
        • Holiday Gift Guide 2020
        • Holiday Gift Guide 2019
        • Holiday Gift Guide 2018
        • Holiday Gift Guide 2017
        • Holiday Gift Guide 2016
      • Pro Skier Interviews
    • FORUMS
    • STORE
      • Guides & Maps
      • Gear Deals
        • Alpine Touring Boots
        • Backcountry Skis
        • Alpine Touring Bindings
        • Backcountry Accessories
        • Off-Season Gear
        • Climbing Skins
    • ROUTES
    • LODGING
      • Coast Mountains
      • Interior Mountains
      • Rocky Mountains
    • VIDEOS
      • 2022/23 Gear Reviews
      • 2021/22 Gear Reviews
      • 2020/21 Gear Reviews
      • 2019/20 Gear Reviews
      • 2018/19 Gear Reviews
      • 2017/18 Gear Reviews
      • 2016/17 Gear Reviews
      • 2015/16 Gear Reviews
      • 2014/15 Gear Reviews
      • 2013/14 Gear Reviews
      • 2012/13 Gear Reviews
      • 2011/12 Gear Reviews
      • 2020 Outdoor Retailer
      • 2019 Outdoor Retailer
      • 2018 Outdoor Retailer
      • 2017 Outdoor Presscamp
      • 2017 Outdoor Retailer
      • 2016 Outdoor Presscamp
      • 2016 Outdoor Retailer
      • 2015 SIA Show
      • 2014 Outdoor Retailer
      • 2013 SIA Show
      • 2012 Outdoor Retailer
      • Tips and Tricks
      • Backcountry Skiing
    • SAFETY
      • Plan Ahead
      • Equipment
      • Resources
      • Avalanche Skills Training
      • Managing warmth & heat loss
    • ABOUT
      • Advertise
      • Glossary
      • Contact Us
    • REVIEWS
      • Ski Gear
      • Clothing
      • Accessories
      • Off-Season Gear
      • Lifestyle
      • Lodges and Accommodation
      • Nutrition
      • Manufacturers
      • Destinations
      • Training
      • Gear of the Year
      • Best New Summer Gear
      • Holiday Gift Guide
      • Pro Skier Interviews
    • FORUMS
    • STORE
      • Guides & Maps
      • Gear Deals
    • ROUTES
    • LODGING
      • Coast Mountains
      • Interior Mountains
      • Rocky Mountains
    • VIDEOS
      • 2022/23 Gear Reviews
      • 2021/22 Gear Reviews
      • 2020/21 Gear Reviews
      • 2019/20 Gear Reviews
      • 2018/19 Gear Reviews
      • 2017/18 Gear Reviews
      • 2016/17 Gear Reviews
      • 2015/16 Gear Reviews
      • 2014/15 Gear Reviews
      • 2013/14 Gear Reviews
      • 2012/13 Gear Reviews
      • 2011/12 Gear Reviews
      • 2020 Outdoor Retailer
      • 2019 Outdoor Retailer
      • 2018 Outdoor Retailer
      • 2017 Outdoor Presscamp
      • 2017 Outdoor Retailer
      • 2016 Outdoor Presscamp
      • 2016 Outdoor Retailer
      • 2015 SIA Show
      • 2014 Outdoor Retailer
      • 2013 SIA Show
      • 2012 Outdoor Retailer
      • Tips and Tricks
      • Backcountry Skiing
    • SAFETY
      • Plan Ahead
      • Equipment
      • Resources
      • Avalanche Skills Training
      • Managing warmth & heat loss
    • ABOUT
      • Advertise
      • Glossary
      • Contact Us

    HOTTEST REVIEWS


    Elan Ripstick 106 Black Edition Skis Dynafit Free 107 Skis Ortovox Diract Voice Transceiver Burton Straight Chuter Splitboard Scarpa 4-Quattro XT Boots Atomic Backland Carbon Boots Plum OAZO Bindings

    VIDEOS YOU'LL LIKE


    Avalanche Transceivers 101 Dalbello Quantum Boots How To Buy a Transceiver North Face FUTURELIGHT Jacket Faction La Machine Skis Tecnica Zero G Tour Pro Boots Plum OAZO Bindings

    NEWSLETTER SIGNUP

    Unsubscribe
    • Home
    • »
    • REVIEWS
    • »
    • Ski Gear
    • »
    • Skis
    • »
    • Blizzard Zero G 105 Skis

    Blizzard Zero G 105 Skis

    Backcountry Skiing Canada Gear of the Year

    Blizzard's re-designed Zero G 105 Skis are a lightweight touring ski that can also tackle the resort groomers. If you are looking for one ski to master it all then look no further. The Zero G will make you smile no matter the terrain, conditions or adventure.

    The Backcountry Skiing Canada Team.


    After a successful four year run, Blizzard decided it was time to update their pinnacle touring ski line—the Zero G. There was never any doubt that the Zero G skis are one of the lightest touring skis on the market but there was room for improvement when it came to their downhill performance. Climbing, the Zero G skis performed admirably, but when conditions tightened up and got more challenging the current Zero G skis could be less than forgiving and not as stable as one would like. Blizzard took on the challenge of making their ultralight Zero G skis as much fun to ski on the way down as they were to skin with on the way up—and succeeded. 

    Blizzard  Zero G 105 Skis

    Unfortunately this solid black tops heet design is is not the retail version of the Zero G 105's as it's pretty sweet.

    Blizzard  Zero G 105 Skis
    SHOW THE REST OF THE REVIEW / PHOTOS / VIDEOS

    Backcountry Skiing Canada received a pair of pre-production Zero G 105 skis in advance of their Fall 2019 retail launch and has been putting them through the paces for months now. While all the new Zero G skis in the line (this includes the 105, 95 and 85 widths) still have a generous tip and tail rocker, they have been upgraded with a new and improved Carbon Drive 2.0 construction. What does that mean? It’s a three-dimensional, uni-directional carbon overlay around the Zero G’s Paulownia wood core right down to the sidewalls of the skis. This overlay tapers toward the front and back of the ski making the tips and tails softer, more playful and forgiving.

    Blizzard  Zero G 105 Skis

    Carbon Drive 2.0 optimizes the Zero G’s flex and torsional rigidity which means better stability and edge grip and ultimately control. The Zero G skis have a long contact with the snow surface which further improves stability on all types of terrain, a longer radius sidecut also makes the skis more forgiving and less catchy, especially in variable snow conditions. The skis also have a rounded 3D top edge design which helps reduces the skis weight by a reported 15%, making the Zero G 105 fat enough for powder turns but still light enough to crush the skin track.

    Blizzard  Zero G 105 Skis
    Blizzard  Zero G 105 Skis

    If you purchase the Zero G 105 Skis be sure to consider Blizzard’s new Pomoca Tech skins. These are the ideal companion to the Zero G 105 skis and won’t slow you down on the skin track. Their unique front fixation design works seamlessly with any of the Zero G skis and contributes to the skin’s light weight. With a 70% mohair and 30% nylon plush you get an ideal glide as well as an inherent waterproof treatment.

    Blizzard  Zero G 105 Skis

    Features:

    • Carbon Drive 2.0 construction.
    • Three-dimensional, uni-directional carbon overlay.
    • Paulownia wood core.
    Blizzard  Zero G 105 Skis

    Generous camber underfoot for pop and carve.

    Blizzard  Zero G 105 Skis
    The Zero G 105's have rocker in the tips and tails for float in deep snow.
    Blizzard  Zero G 105 Skis
    Blizzard  Zero G 105 Skis

    Verdict:

    Three years ago we reviewed the Blizzard Zero G 95 Skis and were impressed by their gravity-defying weight which made them an easy decision for a dedicated touring ski. The only issue with the skis was that their insanely light weight meant that they were challenging to ski in variable snow conditions. When Blizzard decided to redesign the Zero G skis their goal was to make them more forgiving and stable on hardback and at speed. They wanted to make the new Zero G more of a quiver of one ski that can master the pow and still rail groomers at the resort.

    I’m happy to say that they’ve succeeded. The new Zero G 105 skis that I’ve been touring on for the last two months in advance of their fall 2019 release have thoroughly impressed me. They no longer sacrifice stability on the way down for an ultralight walk on the way up. The new Zero G 105 skis still master pow like their predecessors but it sure is nice to know that when the going gets tough they've got your back. The very first time I toured on the Zero G 105’s I was impressed with how light they were on the skin track, admittedly some of this credit had to go to the Marker Alpinist bindings which I mounted them with, but the ski itself was still crazy light. The changes that Blizzard made to the new Zero G’s construction made skiing fun once I got back in bounds and had 2,000’ of copped up groomer crud to navigate at the end of the day. I was shocked at how different this ski performed when the snow was no longer soft and plentiful. With a softer tip and tail, the Zero G 105 skis are much more forgiving and playful in all snow conditions without giving up any weight savings or performance in deeper snow.

    If you’re looking for a super light touring ski that can still perform in bounds when the snow and terrain may be less than inspiring then consider the Blizzard  Zero G 105 Skis. They impressed the hell out of me and this is why I’d consider them a true single quiver ski.

    PROS:

    • Crazy light.
    • Able to rail groomers.
    • Made for touring but can ski the resort too.
    • Forgiving.

    CONS:

    • 180cm is a little short and 188 a little long, 185cm would be the Goldilocks measurement for me.
    • Top sheep marks easily and the black colour (I prefer this top sheet design) makes snow stick but luckily this is not the retail version.

    SPECS:

    Price: $849.95CAN / $899.95US
    Lengths: 164, 172, 180, 188cm
    Dimensions: 133/105/120mm (180cm length)
    Weight: 1530g / 3.37lb (180cm length, per ski)
    Turn Radius: 20-24m

    RATING: 9.5/10

    Powder Performance   2/2 
    Groomer Performance 2/2 
    Stability                      1.5/2
    Weight                        2/2 
    Value                          2/2

    buy backcountry skiing gear


    Did we miss something? Are we totally out to lunch? Let us know what you think. People like/dislike gear for different reasons so chime in below and we'll get a well-rounded evaluation. You'll need to login or register before you can comment but it only takes a few seconds, then you're good to go.

    • Paul Farrugia
      October 23, 2019 19:32
      #
      Hey Brad do you think they would be to stiff and big for the trees at Whitewater, I'm looking for a new set of boards that I can tour with but can handle some good tree skiing thinking of the Dynastar Mythic any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

      Paul
      • Backcountry Skiing Canada Admin
        November 7, 2019 08:28
        #
        Hey Paul, I was really blown away by this ski and how well it skied everything. Not may skis can be this light and still ski groomers, chunder and crap snow but the Zero G 105 can. I use this as my primary touring ski due to the dimensions and lightweight but I know no matter the conditions or even skiing back in bounds I will still have good turns. Can't say that about many other skis. Highly recommend them! The other ski I would consider for a one ski quiver is the G3 FINDr, you can find that review here.

        Let me know what you decide on and how your new set-up performs.
    • Jorgen Jensen
      November 10, 2019 22:10
      #
      Hey Brad
      I am currently skiing 50/50 on a pair og Rossi Soul7 mounted with Marker F12 Tour EPF bindings. I need a new pair of skis and I am considering Head Kore 105 and the Bilzzard Zero G 105. In your experience what would you say are key diffenrences (besides weight)? Especially regarding flotation, forgiveness and short turns/tree skiing? I may mount them with a tour binding or the Salomon shift MNC. My skiing is becoming more and more off-piste and rando. I am 190 cm and 90+ kilos but not an aggressive skier.

       cheers
      JJ
      • Backcountry Skiing Canada Admin
        November 12, 2019 09:47
        #
        Hey Jorgen, thanks for the comment/question, either ski would be a huge upgrade from the Soul 7 for touring. The Zero G will be ligher than the Kore from what I remember and although I have only skied a few laps on the Kore 105 (we are reviewing it this season) I have skied an entire season on the Zero G. I remember the Kore holding a great edge on firm snow and being super responsive but at 300g heavier it will be not as much fun on the up track. The Blizzard Zero G, on the other hand, is super lightweight and skis everything with confidence. They both handle trees and pow well, the Zero G being a little softer than the Kore 105 from what I remember. I'd say the Zero G is more forgiving overall. At 90kg you'd be better with a shift than a pure touring binding if you plan on skiing your new set up in bounds. If it is primarily for touring then I'd go super light with something like the Marker Alpinist 12, it's what I ride out of bounds these days and love it. Super light!!
    • Paul Farrugia
      November 12, 2019 19:36
      #
      The Zero G does look pretty nice I was also looking at Salomon QST 106 or the Atomic Backland 107 I have skied both they seem to be pretty solid through the trees . I looked at the Zero, light but stiff would you say the 105 is less forgiving than the 106 and 107. 

      Cheers Paul
      • Backcountry Skiing Canada Admin
        November 16, 2019 14:33
        #
        Hey Paul, you've tested all the right skis, solid in their own right and any would be a great touring ski. I haven't skied on the new Backland 107 (that ski is due in any day now for testing) but I can say that the 105 is agile and forgiving overall, I really liked how it carved on hardpack and groomer, this surprised me. I would have liked to have gotten the 188 as the 180 is on the short side for stability but is lighter on the up and does a more than fine job on the down. As far as the QST, I skied last years version and found it to ski like a much bigger ski than the Zero G, not a bad thing but it was not as nimble and it much preferred speed over agility. You can't go wrong with any of those skis but I don't think I'll be giving up my Zero G 105's anytime soon!
    • Paul Farrugia
      November 18, 2019 17:04
      #
      Thanks guys, great to here your opinion on the 105's I will be definitely leaning toward them more now. Hope to see out there Brad cheers thanks again.
      • Backcountry Skiing Canada Admin
        November 18, 2019 18:42
        #
        You bet Paul, glad to help out - hopefully, your new set up brings you plenty of smiles...
        (and it starts snowing soon)
    • Paul Farrugia
      December 4, 2019 10:12
      #
      Hey Brad one last question the Zero G 105  has made its way into my  quiver , now I do not have the  ⚽️⚽️  to call myself an expert skier but I can hold my own when need be. The  Zero’s at 180 did seem a little short and the 188 did feel like a lot of ski any chance you could offer up some more advice on length  most of my skiing takes place at Whitewater cheers Paul.
      • Backcountry Skiing Canada Admin
        December 4, 2019 22:08
        #
        Hey Paul, great to hear they made their way into your collection, the 180cm and 188cm are a spread so it is a tough choice. I am 6'1" and would like to ski on a 185cm ski so I had to make the same call. Given that I only ski out of bounds on mine and the fact that I mounted Marker Alpinist bindings on them to keep them light, I went for the short 180cm length. Figured the 8cm savings would save me weight on the up track. I do notice the lack of the extra 5cm occasionally when I hit the front seat in thicker snow but for the most part I think I made the right call as 188cm is a touch long for me and when it comes time to do kick turns on the up track, I am so glad I went shorter. Hope this helps with your decision and if you are shorter than 6'1" I'd say the 180cm would be the right call, but it's ultimately up to you. I'll have mine up at Whitewater this weekend if you want to size them up?
    • Christian Strachan
      January 9, 2020 21:48
      #
      Hi, thanks for the review! I'm considering getting this as my quiver-of-one b/c ski for Colorado. In that regard, do you think it'd do at least adequately well in spring conditions in steeps?
      • Backcountry Skiing Canada Admin
        January 14, 2020 20:34
        #
        Hey Christian, This is definitely a quiver of one ski and super light for touring, can't recommend enough really. I've found it to be great in all conditions and it should work well for you—let us know how it goes if you pull the trigger?
    • Ola Kollin
      April 21, 2020 11:53
      #
      Hello and thanks for the review!I´m about to buy some new "wider" skies mostly for touring but I guess I will use them if there is some powder days close to the lift as well :)I have been touring on Soul 7 HD (189 cm) so far but want something lighter but still with very good and fun downhill performance. I´m 6.1 and 190 lbs and a quite good skier in my opinion :D.I live in Sweden and we don´t have the super big mountains all the time. I like playful skies and ski in the forest but of course also big and nice turns in the pow when possible:).
      My plan is to have this "touring" skies and a narrower all mountain ski around 95 mm i my "ski park".I´m looking at the Blizzard Zero G 105 and Line Vision 108 at the moment but can´t decide what to go for... I guess they are a bit different from each other but can you give me some pros and cons compared to each other? The Vision are very playful as I understand, how about the Blizzard? How big effect does the bigger radius and stiffness of the Blizzard have on the playfulness for example?Do you think Line in 183 cm and the Blizzard in 180 cm could be good sizes? Or could 189 go for the Line considering the different radius, rocker, stiffness etc?

      Thank you.Best regards Ola
      • Backcountry Skiing Canada Admin
        April 21, 2020 21:29
        #
        Hi Ola, thanks for posting the question. The Blizzard Zero G 105 Skis won our Gear of the Year Award and for good reason. This is what I would consider a quiver of one ski, it obviously tours amazingly well given its weight and width but it also can rail on groomers which a lot of lightweight touring skis cannot say. While the Line Vision 108's are also a great touring ski and super fun they just don't carve the same way as the Blizzard's Zero G 105's do. Be sure to read the Line Vision 108 Ski review here. I have been skiing on the Zero G 105's for two seasons now and have no plan on changing skis anytime soon as I am just so impressed at how they ski anything your throw at them. I am 6'1" and 180lbs and ski on the 180's and wish I had the 188's as I do find they ski a little short for me but not so short they affect things too much. I just find that I get in the front seat a little too often, the 188cm length would help with this but is also heavier on the skin track and makes kick turns a little more difficult though. 

        I think you would be super happy with either the Blizzard's Zero G 105's or the Line Vision 108's but my vote would go for the Zero G 105 skis. As far as length that is a toss-up and depends upon your skiing style and if you are in deep snow more often than not as well as if you want to go a little lighter? Either way, you can't go too wrong. Let me know what you end up deciding and how you like them. I hope that this helped a little :)
    • Roman Kujawa
      December 30, 2020 12:20
      #
      Hi, I really like these skis, but I don't know what length to choose.  I have 176 cm and 75 kg.  Should I go to 172 or 180 cm?  Now I ride 176 cm Zag ubac xl.  Thanks so much for the help
      • Backcountry Skiing Canada Admin
        January 5, 2021 18:03
        #
        Hi Roman, that’s a persona decision but since you ride the UBAC 176 (great ski btw) then I think the 180 would be fine for you. For reference, I am 175lb and 6’1” and ride the 188cm version. I found the 180cm too short for me.
        • Roman Kujawa
          January 22, 2021 03:49
          #
          Thanks so much for the advice and recommendations. I also think 180 cm is better for me.
          • Backcountry Skiing Canada Admin
            January 22, 2021 11:06
            #
            Good Luck Roman, hope you enjoy them as much as I do!
    • Roman Kujawa
      February 14, 2021 00:10
      #
      I have a question for you regarding the assembly of bindings. The mounting point is marked on the ski, but there are two  lines, and I do not know which is recommended by the manufacturer or better for me. 

      Thank you for the information


      Roman Kujawa
      • Backcountry Skiing Canada Admin
        February 16, 2021 16:43
        #
        Hi Roman, thanks for the comment/question. I don't see the lines you are speaking of on the Blizzard Zero G 105 skis I have. If you are going to mount these yourself then I can see the confusion but if you are going to get a shop to do it then they will know where the ski's centre is and which mark to use - you just need to specify to them if you want them mounted centre, forward or back. If you are in a real pinch you could send me a photo of it and I could try and determine it as well.
    • Thomas Grunling
      April 14, 2021 11:43
      #
      Hi Brad, I live up at Sun Peaks and I am looking at getting myself a backcountry set up.  Based on your review the Blizzard 105 is one of my considerations.  I also was considering the Findr, Volkl BMT 109.  I have a resort ski so this set up would be mostly for hut trips and a bit of slackcountry.  I was thinking maybe a G3 binding or any other tech binding that you might recommend.  Thanks for your time and input.
      • Backcountry Skiing Canada Admin
        April 21, 2021 09:17
        #
        Hi Thomas, all of those skis you mentioned are going to make you smile on the up track and on the descent but if this is a touring only set up then I would go light and fat. I too have a resort set up so I go super light with my backcountry set up as it saves so much energy on the climb which means more laps and more smiles. The lightest of those skis is the Blizzard Zero G and it's still plenty wide enough for deep powder days. I've ski toured on all three and they all performed well but the Zero G's weight just can't be beat for its dimensions. I think you'd like this ski for not only powder but also more challenging terrain and conditions. The new G3 Zed binding is super light and has more features than the Marker Alpinist but I went with the Alpinist again for its crazy weight savings. Give those two reviews a read and let me know what you end up getting and how you like the new set up.

        The G3 Zed Binding Review is here and the Marker Alpinist Binding is here, there are also plenty of other good options to read about here.
    • Gary Garrison
      November 30, 2021 14:20
      #
      Hi Brad, Thanks for the excellent review. I have been skiing the Black Crows Navis Freebird. Picked up the zero g 95 this year mostly for spring skiing in the Rockies and spring tours in the alps. I am very impressed with the 95 and considering the Zero G 105 as a replacement for the Black Crows. Any thoughts about how the Zero G 105 might compare with the Black Crows? I do like the Black Crows(especially in variable snow) but would not mind dropping a pound in weight.
      • Backcountry Skiing Canada Admin
        December 6, 2021 11:53
        #
        Hey Garry, you have what I would consider to be two of the best skis on the market in your ski quiver now and adding in the Zero G 105 would give you a light and fat option for bigger touring days. While I love the Black Crows Freebird skis they are like you said a pound heavier than needed for touring. The Zero G 105 Skis are still my go to touring ski mounted with Marker Alpinist 12 Bindings. A super light set up considering the width of that ski and yet they can still carve groomers and hold their own when conditions go variable on you. While they will not have the power of the Freebirds (they are still more than adequate)—due to their lighter weight, the Zero G 105's are still a lot of fun and impress me every time I ski them. They really are a quiver of one ski and that is rare to find. I'd be interested to know your thoughts if you pick up a pair. I can't say enough good things about them!
    • Gary Garrison
      October 2, 2022 08:03
      #
      Hey Brad, Thanks for your comments on the Zero G question above. I did pick up the 105 and love that ski and the 95. They ski aggressive and are highly energetic. On wind buffed glaciers or refrozen snow in the spring they were difficult. No edge bite under the mid section of the ski. Have you seen this years ski. Is there any reason to believe they may have addressed this in the new models construction?
      • Backcountry Skiing Canada Admin
        March 8, 2023 07:01
        #
        Hi Gary, glad you picked up the Zero G's - they are still one of my favourite ultra-light touring skis. You mentioned that they were difficult "On wind buffed glaciers or refrozen snow in the spring" and that they didn't bite under foot. In these conditions it is hard to get any ski to grip really, especially a lighter ski like the Zero G 105 and 95's. For this you would have to go to a heavier ski with greater torsional stiffness and even them it would still be challenging as these conditions the worst of the worst.

    Leave a Comment:

    Back to the rest of the reviews.


    We built this backcountry skiing community for you, the passionate skier, and hope you enjoy the hard work we put into all the reviews, routes, videos, and posts we create. It’s been free from day one but that doesn’t mean it’s not a valuable resource. If you enjoy this website and value the content we create for you, then please support Backcountry Skiing Canada by donating today or by clicking on those sponsor ads and 'Buy Now' links at the bottom of the reviews. Thank you!

    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy

    Copyright © 2022-23 Backcountry Skiing Canada. All Rights Reserved.